Today, the European Union has been part of legislation and produced an agreement with Microsoft concerning the browser that the operating method runs. As several know Internet Explorer will be the default browser for the Windows operating method. For one reason or yet another European Union thought that this was an unfair practice. Instead a list of browsers is going to be offered to the end user in a neutral window offering several of one of the most common browsers like Firefox, Safari, Opera, also as others.
The European Union is citing that it's uncompetitive for Microsoft to install their own browser as the default since these other browsers "should" be chosen based on competitive merits versus whatever is installed on the machine by default. Whilst this may possibly not seem like a poor notion, when the principle is taken to other aspects of the applications and operating method it becomes a large mess. If you come from the Linux world, you know that you will find hundreds of applications that do the very same factor. Take a file manager as an example. Should Microsoft's default file manager be put on a huge list of the 100's offered so that the end user can choose one based on merits? What about mice pointers? In fact, you will find some extremely nice looking mice pointers on the market that aren't the default Microsoft one. So what you have to do is to choose the best pointer that works best for you so that you can work comfortably.
Nevertheless, when the principle is taken to the extreme, eventually users would be sitting there for hours and hours creating selections based on what they wanted for every component of their system. It would be time consuming and pointless. It appears that when a person makes the selection to purchase Microsoft Windows, they are creating their selection then for all these parts of the method. In addition, those who are conscious of other browsers are going to download and install the one they adore the most regardless if there's a neutral selection of browsers.